There is no doubt that nowadays more successful countries financially support less reach ones. As it does not help to deal with that problem some people think reacher regions have to help using other ways. Overall,
this
essay partly agrees with the latter statement supporting my point of view by examples.
Linking Words
Firstly
, a donation by developed nations probably is not able to improve the situation if a high level of corruption has advanced inside the poorer area. Linking Words
Instead
of waste of money, in Linking Words
this
case, the more beneficial idea could be a particular aid in building schools, kindergartens for children, organising a valuable education for local citizens. Linking Words
For instance
, the British government formed a specific establishment in Bangladesh for teachers so that they can receive appropriate coaching and implement it in future.
Linking Words
Secondly
, sending money apparently can turn out useless in a case if the local authority power cannot administer Linking Words
this
financial aid correctly due to a depressed economy inside. Predictably, Linking Words
this
help would be only for short-term goals, because the government eventually will spend all wealth sharply. The possible solution might be humanitarian help for people and organisations, Linking Words
for example
, medicines, volunteers, products, so, Linking Words
as a result
, dwellers highly likely will have a chance to tackle the current issues.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
in the modern world developed nations have the possibility to sponsor poorer countries, in most cases the direct cash could be pointless due to complicated economical circumstances there. Linking Words
Therefore
, in my opinion, the investment in educational organisations and non-financial aid may be more profitable for developing and undeveloped communities.Linking Words
nva2704