Environmental hazards are often too great for particular countries or individulas to tackle. We have arrived at a point in time where the only way to lessen environmental problem is at an international level . To what extent do you agree or disagree.

It is often said that environmental dangers are regularly too great for peculiar

countries

or individuals to solve and the only method to reduce the

problems

of the

environment

is at a global level. From my point of ,view, I strongly agree with

this

idea that the problem of the

environment

should be lessened by international organizations.

Firstly

,one of the conspicuous reasons for

this

argument is preventing creat damage to the natural

environment

by universal organizations.

For example

,international groups usually force the governments to prohibit hazardous activities by factories

such

as spiling toxic wastes in rivers

in addition

to creating pollutants.

This

would create a regulation at a universal level

besides

a distinctive rull to perform by all

countries

in the world.

Therefore

this

makes it clear why enforcing universal rules could help to lessen environmental

problems

.

Secondly

,another significant reason is the benefits of creating a global organization to help

countries

related to

problems

of the

environment

.

For instance

,establishing universal groups

besides

pressure groups in rainforests to inhibit illegal hunting and logging could reduce the number of dangers in the

environment

.

This

is a quality that the international level has but

countries

and individuals don't have.

As a result

,it becomes apparent global supervision could be always the best measure to reduce the

problems

of the

environment

. To summarise ,I completely believe that legislating at global levels is the sole means to diminish environmental trouble. It is predicted that with international supervision the problem of the natural

environment

will continue to lessen constructively.