These days, people hold an argument about rewarding
in school practices.
I accept that it is justifiable for
to give
for excellent
, I am still more in favour of the view that
who make progress should be given compliments and physical
.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why
have a tendency to reward
with good academic performance. One of them is that
can be a strong motivation for good
to push their limits and become the best version. If their strenuous efforts are ignored, excellent
can feel insecure, pressured and unmotivated to maintain their brilliant outcomes.
, rewarding outstanding
can present good role models for lazy
and motivate them to study harder. In fact, children can be easily stimulated by external factors
as compliments and
, so weak
may be more determined in their study so as to be honoured by
and their classmates.
, I hold a firm belief that weak
who can try their best to improve their academic outcomes deserve to be recognized and rewarded. Indeed, in the competitive world, adults are always under pressure from achievements, which means they seem to put more emphasis on the final results
of the progress.
leads to many weak
being left behind others without any attention from
.
,
with poor academic results may find it hard to find out how to learn in a proper way, or they can become uninterested and overwhelmed with a huge amount of knowledge provided at school.
, just a simple and thoughtful action from
as a compliment or a small present for their small improvements can be a strong catalyst boosting weak
' inner will. To sum up, education should aim to help and treat all
equally, especially
with poor academic outcomes to become better through recognizing their efforts.
In conclusion, it can be reasonable when many
are likely to give gifts for good
in class, yet I gravitate more toward the view that
who make serious attempts in their study should be encouraged by
from
.
, I suppose that motivating
through their minimal progress should be considered as the essence of educational settings.