Because of modern technology it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but other believe that handwriting is still an important skills. Discuss both views and give your opinion

In a contemporary computerized era, it is not needful for the public to learn handwriting skills while others believe that writing is still an imperative skill. In

this

essay, I will examine the question from both sides and

then

I will give my opinion on

this

matter. On

one

side of an argument, there are crowds who argue about the benefits of handwriting outweigh its disadvantage.

One

logic behind

this

belief is that whenever we are, we can use only

by

Change preposition

apply

show examples

pen and paper without wasting so much time. We don’t necessary any costly equipment for it. And the

second

logic for it is that handwriting is unique, no

one

can copy it. Because of uniqueness,

for instance

, a sign of a person can make a big amount of transactions. Many important documents depend on a manual sign. It is not replaceable by any gadget. On the other side of the argument, there are crowds who argue that handwriting is not a required skill in

this

era.

One

logic behind

this

thought is that most of the person does a fund transfer by using a computer.

Likewise

, if anyone wants to transfer money

then

no need to manual sign in today's world, only a single click can transfer the fund. So in daily

rotine

Correct your spelling

routine

, the public doesn’t need to write anything. And

last

sense is that working people need to work in the computer so no need to writing anything in routine activity. In my opinion, handwriting is not much needed in daily growth because we all are working by using the latest technology where we just need to press buttons. In conclusion, I believe that both arguments have their merits.

However

, on balance, I believe the had writing should not disappear because occasionally it is very imperative for some documents and

also

not needed in daily activity.