Health care should not be provided for free regardless of a person’s income. The health of a person is in their own hands and they should, therefore, be held accountable for that. Do you agree with this statement?

There is a view that medical subsidies should not be provided to citizens irrespective of their financial status, I completely disagree with

this

notion.

Although

, there is no doubt that it is an individual's responsibility to take

care

of their own well-being, in my opinion, free, strength

care

services are quite essential to provide good well-being for the

people

below the poverty line and to raise the economic growth of the country.

Firstly

, free of cost medical

care

should be provided for the low earning society for their whole life. If not, who will take

care

of these

people

? While the government may have to allocate more budget, poor

people

will stay healthy and will work for themselves.

For example

, every 5 out of 10 homeless

people

dies because of a minor disease, that can be easily cured at the hospital. These tragic deaths can be minimized if the governing authorities can help them financially.

Secondly

, the good fitness of working employees defines the growth of the nation as employment sectors are largely responsible for the economic growth of the country. In

this

present world, every working professional is doing their job relentlessly in their field

such

as education, fitness, office, agriculture etc.

For instance

, most developed nations give free health insurance to every worker, in fact, during the nationwide lockdown, some western countries donated monthly funds to critical families for food and shelter. To conclude, the government has to take

care

of their citizens regardless of their buying power. Especially, the

people

below the poverty line and the audience who is contributing to the nation’s economy should be admissible to free medical insurance.