Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Disscus both view and give your opinion.

It is argued by a huge community of people that it is more beneficial to live in a horizontal society, while others claimed that the advantages of a vertical city are significantly outweighed.In my perspective, living in skyscrapers have several benefits for both individuals and the environment.In the following paragraphs, I will discuss both points of view.

First

of all,by choosing to have life in high_rise building areas, the public helps to save the natural habitat,

moreover

, they figure out overpopulation issues.To cue evidence,in recent years,due to the population explosion authorities decide to construct high sky accommodations rather than separate houses and surprisingly,the colossal proportion of overcrowding is solved.

For instance

,in China, working_class citizens prefer to live in multi_level buildings owing to the fact that it cut their commute time because these types of apartments

located

Add a missing verb

are located

show examples

in metropolitan areas.

In addition

, obviously, vertical cities require less space,so it damages the surroundings much less.

On the other hand

,a horizontal city has many amenities.To exemplify,each single_family has its own private garden and back yard.

Besides

that,the service expenditure in these constructions is not as costly as in the multiple storey residence.

For example

, crowds who live in an individual house do not have security charges for the building or elevator fees.To sum up, they may have peaceful lives. To conclude, living both in a massive skyscraper or in a private space have their own strengths.

However

,I strongly believe that possessing a house in double_storied buildings have more merits to compare with single houses.As far as I'm concerned,at some point in the future 90% of cities will be vertical forms.