Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that the

government

should provide free

education

for all

students

whether they are rich or poor.

Although

I agree that it would be a good policy for pupils that ease their financial pressure directly, I think that it might be fairer if the

government

can collect the tuition fee based on their financial level. On the one hand, the university is one of the most important properties to the

government

because it is a place to help youngsters to develop their skills, knowledge, and prepare to get into society later.

Moreover

, teenagers always are the main pillar of the city that will improve national productivity in the future. Meanwhile,

for instance

, some countries like Finland and Sweden have provided free

education

to everyone because they believe everyone has the same right to study and learn. While a country with a higher

education

level can lower the crime rate and more job opportunities.

On the other hand

, the

government

subsidies should be put in the right place and give support to

students

who really it needs. When pupils come from rich families, they already get financial support from their parents.

However

,for a student with poor economic backgrounds, the university tuition fee seems a big amount to them. Sometimes,

students

quit or gave up their university offer because they do not have money even they have the quality.

Thus

, based on the limited resources, the

government

needs to clarify who needs help

first

. In conclusion, though I agree that the

government

should allocate a larger part of its budget to free the

education

tuition, I think it still needs to depend on student financial level or the

government

can offer more scholarships to

students

which only focus on their grades and abilities.