Insurmountable financial problems that we have been trying to cope with, have made us think about going towards a unit
worldwide by which we can bypass the obstacles currently existing in front of us in trading and commerce.
, I would say
will not be a good idea as it will worsen the
by provoking more economic turbulence. Both sides of the debate as well as some problems expected to arise by
decision are explained as follows.
, some economists believe that having a single
trading and
will bring about more economic prosperity. Exchanging
has served as a barrier in large scale businesses and those involved have always been lodging complaints about the difficulties the exchange process has imposed on them. In every ,trade a certain amount of commission must be put aside and
is just the tip of the iceberg, the rate of different currencies against each other fluctuates instantaneously and a mere unexpected alteration would make a huge difference.
, though, I would assert having a unit global
not only would not help international commerce
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
could exacerbate the
as from an economic point of view our
is so uneven. Comparing today's economic
of the
, we encounter a huge gap whose bridge does not seem possible in short term. Having a single
would worsen the
a
laundry could become more accessible for drug dealers and smugglers, not to mention terrorists. Take Europe as an example in which almost all countries are developed and have a satisfactory annual income per capita.
, the attempt to have a single
at the beginning of the 21st century almost has failed and some countries
as the UK have withdrawn recently. Considering the economic homogeneity that exists in Europe, imagine how chaotic the
might get if all countries-including those so-called
nations whose economics have been getting smaller had the opportunity to use the same global
.
As regards problems of having a global
, I would say
would be a complete fallthrough as it would fan the flames of large-scale crimes
as human trafficking and drug dealing, as felons would have the opportunity to transfer
without being questioned. Exchanging process is currently serving as a barrier against
laundry and without it, anarchy is inevitable in
circulation.
, it is the competition that has been punishing forward our
. Having been stuck in
unwanted rivalry, countries must put their best foot forward to stabilize their position in the
. Undoubtedly. without
, a competition we would not come
far and we might be still dealing with meeting our rudimentary needs.
In conclusion, having a unit global
seems fantastic, it is fanciful though and without meeting some preconditions
as reaching universal equity, it is nothing more than bluff for some politicians intending to get under the spotlight.