in the last century, urban areas were developed through building tall builidings, avoiding wide flat ones. The advantages outweigh the disadvanatges?

Arguably, it is commented that from the hundred years ago
cities
advancement has been concentrated on skyscrapers premises disregarding the horizontal infra-structures. Personally, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks since
this
model of settlement development economize the devised space providing a plethora of accommodations for a large number of individuals.
Although
it is much money-consuming.
This
essay will shed light on both sides of the view and provide evidence to prove the arguments. On the one hand, tall premises accommodate more citizens in a small land. Because of the high demand for placement throughout urban areas, edifices give out living space to a high number of the local livings. The recent research carried out by the University Zambeze showcased that in 70% of big
cities
where the local authorities invested in the high-rise buildings, the living issues were resolved
for instance
.
As a result
, communities were delighted by the government management style.
Furthermore
, it is pointed out as a prime reason why many European ruling powers resolved their lodging problem. On the one hand, superstructures are financial resources consuming.
In other words
, in these sorts of structures a million dollars is necessary to its construction, the number of resources a few nations endure. 90% of the Africa urban
cities
are wide flat due to the budget shortfall , it has been identified by the University of Oxford University overhaul done
last
month
for example
.
Moreover
, it is the overriding purpose for widespread horizontal settlements in the key Africa States. In conclusion, notwithstanding superstructures being taxes-wasting,
this
type of urban areas management solve the future housing problem.
Therefore
, I still believe that the advantages outweigh the pitfalls. I would go as far as to say the local cabinet should allocate more financial resources in
this
sort of premises to respond to upcoming housing issues inside
cities
.
Submitted by vascomunguarepenete on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: