some people think that government should provide assistance to all kind of artists including painter musician and poets etc. however other people think that it is a waste of money discuss both view and give your opinion.

Whether or not to allocate a budget to the development of

art

has always been a debated topic.

While

some support the need for sponsoring

artists

, others argue that the money is squandered and could be utilized for more meaningful causes. I agree that

government

Correct article usage

the government

show examples

should cease funding musicians, painters or poets and prioritize solving other important problems. On the one hand, there are several struggles which citizens face in their daily

life

Fix the agreement mistake

lives

show examples

that need immediate attention from the authorities.

Instead

of spending huge amounts of funds

in

Change preposition

on

show examples

sponsoring

artists

who may not contribute to the progress of the country, it would be more beneficial if the money is spent on improving healthcare and educational facilities for the public. If the amount spent on building and maintaining

art

galleries ,

for instance

, was utilized in distributing affordable medicines,

vaccines

Correct word choice

and vaccines

show examples

or improving sanitization in rural areas, rising cases of infections could be reduced drastically.

Moreover

, not every person is interested in music, paintings or poems.

Thus

, sponsoring

artists

should be a least be among the least priority allocations. Others ,

however

, believe in encouraging

art

creators with sufficient funds.

Art

plays a major role in signifying the rich culture and heritage of any country. Historic museums and cultural festivals ,

for example

, which have been providing a platform for

artists

to showcase their creations have always attracted tourists and

art

enthusiasts from different parts of the world for centuries. Funding talented musicians, painters or poets will not only bring economic growth in the form of tourism and entertainment but could

also

be influential in attracting the younger generation into the field of

art

. It is ,

therefore

, crucial for governing bodies to allocate sufficient funds for the

wellbeing

Correct your spelling

well-being

show examples

of the

artists

. In conclusion, I believe that improving the living conditions of the citizens should always be prioritized over assisting

artists

.

Although

the development of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

art

could lead to economic growth

due to

tourism, the investments could be a waste of money if the public facilities need improvement.