some people think that government should provide assistance to all kind of artists including painter musician and poets etc. however other people think that it is a waste of money discuss both view and give your opinion.
Whether or not to allocate a budget to the development of
art
has always been a debated topic. While
some support the need for sponsoring artists
, others argue that the money is squandered and could be utilized for more meaningful causes. I agree that government
should cease funding musicians, painters or poets and prioritize solving other important problems.
On the one hand, there are several struggles which citizens face in their daily Correct article usage
the government
life
that need immediate attention from the authorities. Fix the agreement mistake
lives
Instead
of spending huge amounts of funds in
sponsoring Change preposition
on
artists
who may not contribute to the progress of the country, it would be more beneficial if the money is spent on improving healthcare and educational facilities for the public. If the amount spent on building and maintaining art
galleries ,for instance
, was utilized in distributing affordable medicines, vaccines
or improving sanitization in rural areas, rising cases of infections could be reduced drastically. Correct word choice
and vaccines
Moreover
, not every person is interested in music, paintings or poems. Thus
, sponsoring artists
should be a least be among the least priority allocations.
Others ,however
, believe in encouraging art
creators with sufficient funds. Art
plays a major role in signifying the rich culture and heritage of any country. Historic museums and cultural festivals , for example
, which have been providing a platform for artists
to showcase their creations have always attracted tourists and art
enthusiasts from different parts of the world for centuries. Funding talented musicians, painters or poets will not only bring economic growth in the form of tourism and entertainment but could also
be influential in attracting the younger generation into the field of art
. It is ,therefore
, crucial for governing bodies to allocate sufficient funds for the wellbeing
of the Correct your spelling
well-being
artists
.
In conclusion, I believe that improving the living conditions of the citizens should always be prioritized over assisting artists
. Although
the development of the
Correct article usage
apply
art
could lead to economic growth due to
tourism, the investments could be a waste of money if the public facilities need improvement.Submitted by roshniandy on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Well done on presenting a comprehensive response to the task by discussing both views and providing your opinion clearly. Make sure to provide more specific examples to further support your arguments and make your points more convincing.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay demonstrates a clear and logical structure overall. Ensure that each paragraph is well-connected to the next and that your ideas flow smoothly throughout the essay. Consider using transitional words to improve cohesion further.