It is questioned if the government should give more money to education than the arts. On my behalf, I think that, in some way, art is a way of cultivating people too.
Accordingly
, it shouldn´t be possible to choose one. After all, places Linking Words
such
as museums, galleries, exhibitions, concerts, dancing and other performances, form part of today´s education and even if the state had a bigger budget for schools, these institutions alone will never be enough.
Linking Words
Firstly
, in my opinion, all kinds of creative and artistic professions are very difficult nowadays. An example of Linking Words
this
is the theatre. Not only because it requires a frequent adaptation and inconstancy but Linking Words
also
due to the lack of value these persons receive. Linking Words
Furthermore
, the enfluensive society members should cultivate these departments in order to decrease the state responsibility. After all, it concerns all of us.
Linking Words
Secondly
, assuming that the education would have more money, what would be the advantages? Will these profits be seen? Even if that actually made a difference in the academic formation it could bring a bigger impact on our children´s knowledge about the world. Linking Words
For example
, art is essential through visual learning. Linking Words
Consequently
, it is easier to retain certain information when we have an interaction with it, rather than reading something about the past or just memorizing it.
To conclude, my opinion is extremely against Linking Words
this
statement. Linking Words
Besides
educational purposes, artistic works are important to humans daily lives. Linking Words
Nonetheless
, it brings people joy, distractions, interests and imagination. Altogether, disvaluing the arts will have consequences for all of us.Linking Words
beatriz.ccottinellimc40