Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The question of how much
information
should be shared for scientific study, business, and academic research
have
Change the verb form
has
show examples
sparked off an intense debate. Many believe that it is a spectacular idea to disseminate
information
as much as possible, whereas others argue that some
data
seems too dangerous to be purveyed.
However
, I strongly feel about sharing
information
freely except in a few cases where national
security
is concerned. Proponents of sharing
information
freely go on to argue that
data
ought to be circulated to the full for the sake of sustaining progress. In simple words, sharing knowledge paves the way for discoveries. Covid-19 is a case in point. Many kinds of research are being conducted by scientists across the world, working in collaboration with each other so as to invent a vaccine as soon as possible.
This
also
applies to the business world, which can work together to develop new products, as well as academics, who need to put new
information
into previous perspectives in order to broaden their knowledge and complete new groundbreaking works.
On the contrary
, people who find sharing
data
dangerous, believe that it could pose threats to state
security
. They go on to argue that governments should not share classified
information
, which may hamper global peace.
For example
, classified documents relating to nuclear technology bring our earth to the verge of destruction if any ferocious terrorist group can access these documents.
Similarly
, many companies are reluctant to share knowledge.
This
is because that
information
can stifle their commercial interest.
For instance
, if a company discloses its product formula,
then
the
information
gives the rival company a competitive advantage. In my opinion,
however
, to realize its full advantage
data
needs to be shared freely,
otherwise
, it only benefits its keepers. To put it another way, shared
information
in those fields will be stepping-stones to innovations.
Therefore
, the
information
should not be constrained if there is no
security
concern. In conclusion, both points of view have their merits.
However
, I am of the opinion that
information
sharing ought not to be restricted, unless there are overriding
security
risks.
Submitted by Musaib ul hassan on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • information sharing
  • scientific research
  • business
  • academic world
  • advancement of knowledge
  • progress
  • collaboration
  • cross-disciplinary research
  • open access
  • democratization of information
  • transparency
  • credibility
  • intellectual property
  • security concerns
  • commercial interests
What to do next:
Look at other essays: