One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

With the development of the medical industry, an increasing number of treatments have been invented to cure more and more diseases.
, the elderly are living longer than the
generations did. It is undeniable that long
can cause some problems. When people grow old, they inevitably feel lonely if they are sick and hospitalized and their
Correct your spelling

The word childern is not in our dictionary. If you’re sure this spelling is correct, you can add it to your personal dictionary to prevent future alerts.

are unable to be with them due to having a busy work
. In fact, some diseases,
as cancer or dementia, are incurable and they cost a great deal of money on treatment.
In addition
, patients have to undergo the process of treatment if they want to live longer.
As a result
, they may feel pain and hopelessness, which is why some of the aged choose euthanasia rather than suffering from the pain of illnesses.
On the other hand
, the advantages of living longer are apparent. Old adults can have more
experiences with everything,
for example
, they are free to go everywhere can travel and try any new things, like diving or studying a new instrument, when they are retired.
, some individuals who are bored after retiring can do come meaningful work which contributes to society and people can find personal value during working.
, they are justly proud of what they do and feel satisfied. It is noted that the basic premise of these things is a healthy body. In summary, the elderly may suffer from the pain of illness and they
have more
experience if they live longer. I would think only if elderly people are healthy, the benefits of a longer
will outweigh the disadvantages.
Submitted by jason on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion: you agree or disagree? you think...?...your opinion...?

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays:
  • The people wonder why some employees get more salary than others. This question divides these people into two campuses, the proponent said and the opponent's side. The supportive side says that these employees spent their life to become an old hand in their field, so they should receive some financial appreciation. The other side sees this is a type of discrimination against blue-collar jobs. It seems clear that there are reasons behind this situation coming through several rationale aspects relating to their skills and majors.
  • According to the development of digital technology, the film industry has been expanded so we can see not only movies from famous studios but also films from anyone capable of making films. I personally suppose that this development could have both positive and negative.
  • As well said by someone 'Health is wealth'. Healthy body improves the work ability as well as provides a long health life. Lake of regular exercise invites many deadly diseases. There are several reasons behind working people can not doing exercise. However, it has many solutions also. Both the reasons and relative solutions will justify in ensuring paragraphs.
  • Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it your opinion. ould be stopped. Discuss both views and give Economic development is seemingly achieved at the cost of the environment. This has led some to propose that governments should halt economic growth, but many people posit it as the only panacea for starvation and poverty. My stance is that economic advancement is not entirely to blame for environmental problems and that it plays a key role in alleviating world hunger and breaking the vicious circle of poverty. Admittedly, there is a preponderance of evidence suggesting how countries thriving economically harm the environment. This can be seen in the disappearance of natural habitats due to deforestation, the extinction of many animal species due to poaching and hunting and pollution, of various kinds, due to industrial and agricultural waste. However, such problems are fundamentally caused by maladroit governments that are either unaware of the repercussions of their inaction or condone pernicious human activities because of short-term economic incentives. In other words, if governments around the world had striven for economic sustainability and strictly regulated harmful practices, the world's current economic prosperity could still be achieved – albeit it would take longer. Thus, it is unnecessary to cease economic growth to protect the environment. There are also compelling reasons to argue that growth in global wealth is the only way to eradicate hunger and poverty. With regard to the former, this problem can be remedied by providing those living in destitute regions with food and shelter, but this provision is not financially viable if a country fails to make economic progress. Furthermore, a successful economy invariably engenders more job opportunities, hence allowing more economically disadvantaged people to feed themselves and their families. Nevertheless, the lack of important knowledge areas or job skills confines poor people to a small number of jobs. In order to holistically curb this problem, countries have to allocate more capital to education, for example in the form of educational facilities in less well-off neighborhoods and free vocational courses for under-employed and unemployed adults. Again, without sufficient funds, this capital allocation is impossible. In conclusion, economic development does not necessarily exclude the protection of the environment and vice versa, provided that governments rigorously circumscribe detrimental economic activities. As such, the promotion of economic growth should be embraced so that serious problems such as starvation and poverty could be tackled properly.
  • In this day, while people conduct research into their family background, others pay attention to the present and future generations.In my opinion, we can find a middle ground where all theses opinions are satisfied.