Some people claim that e-books and modern media would fully overtake conventional newspapers and magazines to what point do you agree or disagree?

As the invention of high-tech gadgets is booming in today's modern world. We could particularly see that the space for e-books and modern media has grown,

therefore

it eradicates the conventional newspaper and

also

magazines. In my opinion, I would agree with the statement that e-books have replaced physical

newspapers

.

Firstly

, The media companies have transformed themself to concentrate more on the online version of

news

due to a decrease in demand for the newspaper. In fact, they started to develop their own mobile application and website to serve as a digital platform for newsreaders.

In addition

, the

news

is being broadcasted live on websites, so it is obviously the faster medium to communicate the information.

For instance

, I prefer using mobile applications

such

as Youtube and Facebook to know the latest

news

and

also

by the time I look at the newspaper the

next

day, All the

news

have become outdated.

Secondly

, Printing these magazines and journals would need a huge chunk of paper resources and

this

could end up depleting the natural resources. The media companies

also

feel that web versions are easier, as the physical papers would require sourcing of paper, printing, transition and so on. Indeed producing

newspapers

and magazines incur more costs than the web version. In Conclusion, we could undoubtedly see that digital books and files are more preferred by people as it is freely available on websites and

also

the

newspapers

have become old fashioned. In e-books, there is scope to include multimedia references like audio and video,

on the other hand

, in ,

newspapers

only pictures can be printed along with texts.