Governments should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports. Do you agree or Disagree?

A group of individuals are inclined to think that countries should allocate more funds to

education

than to leisure and competitive games. it is agreed that national budgets should prioritize schools and universities over sports and play. If questioned, I strongly agree with

this

viewpoint. My position is elaborated

further

with reasons and examples. The foremost argument to justify my stand,

Firstly

, the most discernible point is Investment in its

education

system is one of the best ways to improve a country`s economy in the long term.To clarify it properly the more students entering

third

-level

education

, the more skilled a workforce will be and

this

leads to higher innovation and productivity. An optimal example for

this

can be, South Korea and Finland took the decision to invest a large proportion of their budget in

education

and

this

has reaped benefits in the form of high-tech companies

such

as Samsung and Nokia.

However

, people cannot work hard all the time and these companies do provide leisure facilities for their workers.

Furthermore

, Another paramount ground for my belief is

Education

is not just about improving the economy it

also

has many social benefits. No one can deny that well-educated people tend to be more aware of social evils

such

as drugs, alcohol, and sexual health.

For instance

, Singapore educates all of its citizens on the dangers of drugs and

this

has resulted in one of the lowest levels of drug abuse in the world. Despite

this

, sports can

also

teach children valuable soft skills,

such

as teamwork and work ethic which

also

help curb social ills. In conclusion,

education

should take choice over sports when it comes to funding due to the many socio-economics benefits it brings. It is recommended that governments continue to pump money into schools and universities in order to realize long term goals.