Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for a country, while some think it is bad. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Executing global

games

as hosts in

one

case is compatible.

However

, it is not suitable for all aspects. There are both advantages and disadvantages of

this

argument. From my perspective, rendering any playing event as a leader is appropriate.

To begin

with, sports are a kind of

facts

Fix the agreement mistake

fact

show examples

which provide a lot of pleasure. It

also

removes fatigue from

one

mind. Playing

games

has a successful scenario where it can be implemented anywhere.

As a result

, there is a necessity to commence any play which can give a lot of pleasure. It

also

supplies various pleasures where it can remove the monotonous life.

Thus

, Arranging

games

in

one

country as a host can mark their own case to the whole world.

For instance

, while world cup cricket had been commenced in England, the whole world could apprehend the cultural activity, food habits etcetera of England.

In other words

, there are a lot of criteria for making expenditure of money while the arrangement of playing event is rendered. There needs an issue of providing wealth.

Also

, adequate modification is needed. While playing

games

in

one

state all people focus on

this

. As a consequence, their valuable works are being hampered. In

this

way, it forms a bad impact on the development of a country.

For example

, an official person has to do his work and if there is an event of business he wastes his time to see that

games

. In conclusion, arranging sports in

one

country is good.

Nevertheless

, it is

also

a bad aspect if persons do not ascribe their works while

games

are rendered in their state.