There seems to be na increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed. Discuss both sides.

The rate of serious crimes has been increasing annually. In order to overcome

this

relevant social problem, many defend the

death

penalty

instead

of alternative measures. Considering that

this

is a polemic topic,

this

essay aims to discuss both points of view.

To begin

, the

death

penalty

is the most extreme measure that can be taken,

therefore

it should be an exception, not the general rule. Considering the above-mentioned tendency of growth, if governments keep sending people to die, there would be more deaths and

violence

in the end.

In other words

, the

violence

of the streets and by the

governement

Correct your spelling

government

. So, focusing on the

death

penalty

does not contribute to a reduction of deaths and

violence

rates. Alternatively, while still considering the

death

penalty

for exceptional cases, there are a number of measures that can be taken into account in order to address the

violence

problem.

Firstly

, if the end objective is to reduce

violence

and serious crimes, gun control is essential.

Secondly

, reducing drug

cartel's

Fix the agreement mistake

cartels'

show examples

powers by "tracing the money" strategies has been very effective in many countries.

Finally

, working closely with communities in order to identify

violence

against women and children before they became serious crimes can

also

be a great alternative. To conclude, the

death

penalty

is the most severe one and unfortunately is a reactive measure. It could be adopted for exceptional cases, but it is not enough. Preventative measures

such

as the ones quoted in the previous paragraph are very effective and can be widely used.