Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. Do you agree or disagree?

The institution curriculum is being designed in

such

a way that focuses on the overall development of students in all spheres of life

such

as cognitive, real-time experiences, team effort, etc. Whereas, the final term exam is a part of the evaluation. In my opinion, students gain extra with practical hands-on in a subject which provides wide exposure, and while doing projects in a team broadens their horizon of interpersonal development.

Firstly

, Academics consider fieldwork in mark evaluation. The practical work along with theory helps in comprehending the subject in depth.

For example

, it is challenging to memorize complex scientific theories, but a demo in the laboratory makes it simplified.

Moreover

, it becomes easier for kids to reciprocate the learnings.

Therefore

, practical work plays a crucial role in developing cognitive processes.

Secondly

, completing assignments in a group provides an opportunity towards learning attitude and sharing an accountable thought process to generate more ideas together.

For example

, research revealed that many group tasks have left a remarkable impact on children, in the long term they turned out to be effective in communication. It provides a platform to represent individual thoughts.

Hence

,

this

is a necessary part of the curriculum, where one learns how to delegate a task within a team. In conclusion, the agenda of the educational institutions should consider the growth of students in all aspects

instead

of counting only one factor as a part of marks evaluation.

Although

, theory upholds the base of learning but other factors

such

as project work and mid-term assessment account for equal weightage to mark grades in report cards.