Some today argue that schools are no longer necessary because children can learn so much from the internet and be educated at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

By the advent of the

internet

and its spread among almost all humans, numerous information resources have become reachable for people, among which the educational contents are no exception.

However

, I argue that

this

valuable amenity can not be completely substituted by conventional schools, because some advantages of physical

classes

are not available on the

internet

. On the one hand, it is obvious that the

internet

has revolutionized the education system.

For example

, the online courses have removed the time and location barrier and made it possible for people who live in far-flung and developing areas to attend online

classes

, which in turn helps eliminate illiteracy around the world.

Additionally

, A variety of articles, photos, videos and materials are shared publicly on the

internet

so that every pupil can access them, download them, and review them as many times as they need thanks to the features of the

internet

.

Nevertheless

, I opine that the conventional

classes

are irreplaceable because they bring about some benefits that are not provided by the

internet

.

For instance

, children would experience peer interaction with their classmates as well as learning to compete with their peers, join teamwork groups and ask for help or give help to their counterparts.

Furthermore

, by attending group

classes

, adolescents learn how to abide by the rules and respect the authorities.

Likewise

, traditional

classes

provide monitoring and evaluation for teachers to assure students are on the right track. To summarize,

although

the

internet

could bring about plenty of useful facilities for educating children, it can not be completely replaced by schools, because it lacks a number of considerable options of schools. It is better to use it as a supplement for studies under the supervision of teachers.