Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is considered by some that it is essential for pupils to learn about foods and the ways that they are made in scientific approach, whilst there are others who think that the time should be spent on the more significant lessons. Whereas there are some benefits to the opinion of the

second

group, I strongly believe that the idea of the

first

crowd is more reasonable. Both views will be addressed in

this

essay. On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the merits of gaining knowledge about meals and cooking considerably outweigh the drawbacks. The main reason for believing

this

is that

this

matter is associated with the health of a society.

In other words

, if students learn about

this

issue, they will undoubtedly be able to change society's eating habits.

Furthermore

, avoiding obesity could be one of the most significant results of

this

idea. To be more precise,

this

is a fact that the rate of obesity among the youngsters is obviously higher than the others,

therefore

, teaching them some food principles and meal preparing approaches can be helpful to reduce

this

rate.

For instance

, a recent study in Iran indicates that the rate of fatness between people who have been educated in food science is 60 per cent lower than the others.

On the other hand

, it is argued by some that educational institutes should put a premium on the other lessons as opposed to foods. People often have

this

opinion because

This

subject can be easily learnt in other ways.

In other words

, it is an experimental skill and it is not necessary to be taught in schools and universities.

In addition

,

this

is a common belief that

this

subject will not be practical in jobs for the majority of the population.

That is

to say, other sciences not only guarantee the children's future occupations but

also

are supportive of making higher salaries.

For example

, in Iran, the earnings of the public who have studied in meal majors are 20 per cent lower than the crowd with the same grades in other fields. In conclusion,

although

I suppose that both groups have their justifications, I undoubtedly claim that gaining knowledge about dishes and the way they are prepared is completely beneficial. Given

this

situation, it seems to me that these kinds of lessons are better to be a consistent part of schools' curriculums.