Some people think that media should not report detail of crimes to the public. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In

this

twenty-first century, most of the communities opine that the authorities or police must not give each and every fact

which

Correct word choice

that

show examples

is related to a particular offence. From my perspective, I completely agree with

this

certain group of people since there will be a leakage of evidence and more and more questions arise against the government. One of the primary problems regarding sharing details is that it results in the loss of some specific proof. Considering an example, if the heads had provided every single detail of the Abhaya case, which is prominent in Kerala, the culprits

can destroy

Wrong verb form

could have destroyed

show examples

the pieces of equipment used to kill that girl

according to

the investigation report. Ultimately, the public includes the individuals who have committed the crime.

Hence

, it is a significant factor for the defenders not to present the information not only to the public but

also

to the people who are away from the investigation team. Another dominant issue is that the common people start to question the police or investigators.

Consequently

, it brings delay or stop of that occurrence.

For instance

, the You-mi murder in Japan was discontinued

as a result

of the conflicts caused by the public when they acknowledged the crime report.

Thus

, in order to give justice, the public should not interfere in

this

type studies.

To conclude

, data

that is

related to a criminal case whether it is minor or not should not be declared to the society as proof get destroyed and may not get public support. Thence, it is good to have inquiry details as private.