In some countries, the number of shootings increases because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Handgun ownership in

this

Linking Words

era becomes an ordinary habit in numerous countries,

however

Linking Words

, many folks opine here caused of sky-rocketing in gunshots, Clearly, in, contrast some people including me found

this

Linking Words

idea wrong. As far as I know, the number of gun owners is not the main problem these days. Both attitudes are elaborated on in the below essay. Weapons are playing a critical role in safety, not only parents do need firearms to secure their families but juveniles especially girls

also

Linking Words

need special tools

such

Linking Words

as a shocker for protection.

Likewise

Linking Words

, as a vivid example, a father needs to be armed to keep his children safe from any potential abuse

such

Linking Words

as robbery or kidnapping.

Therefore

Linking Words

handguns should be allowed in the right way to be a shield from felonies because criminals found a way to approach guns no matter legal or illegal.

Conversely

Linking Words

, governments should create legislation to restrict pistol ownership in public because it may contribute to the majority of Intentional and unintentional crimes, for, example a youngster may get bullied in school and use the parent's rifle to revenge on classmates, especially in high schools

this

Linking Words

happens a lot.

Moreover

Linking Words

, it could lead to many juvenile delinquencies and many youth prisons filled by the unmatured youngster. To sum up, fire weapons are not shooting their own, the owner is responsible for the revolver shots. To tackle the shooting issue, politicians should add rules for shotguns and societies could find it as a remedy for that issue.