Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Admittedly, the Government is a key role to spend the amount of money wisely, so it can be considered that the money expenditure will be beneficial by constructing

railways

instead

of roads. I definitely agree with

this

perspective since it may lead to a better improvement for people's mobility to commute, which means it will assist in mitigating the climate crisis by using public

transportation

collectively. In the rapid development era, most rich countries are excited to extend the infrastructures significantly, especially connecting suburbs and urban areas with railway stations. Regarding

this

, building the

railways

may be an excellent development that may expand integrated

transportation

or transport hubs, which is linked within the city. The real evidence that can be seen is looking for Singapore, which has the integration

transportation

by MRT (Mass Rapid Transit) railway stations between the city centre and the suburb area, so commuting with the MRT is the most preferred for societies to mobile.

As a result

, the bottleneck of overcrowding roads is plummeted moderately due to the massive user of high-capacity public

transportation

. In terms of reducing traffic congestion, adding more

railways

will be one of the solutions to preserve the environment by cutting the gas emission, which is a result of private

transportation

by burning fossil fuels. Looking at the high-tech country like Japan,

for instance

, the train is the most convenient

transportation

system with its fast as the highest speed train in the world.

Thus

, the interesting

transportation

may persuade people to commute with it and eventually it leads to the benefit that Japan is nominated as the less polluted country in the world. In summary, spending money to build

railways

by the government has a plethora of advantages that may appear overcoming the traffic congestion, flexibility mobilisation and less harmful for the environment, which is I agree with

this

thought.