Large companies use sport events to promote their products. Some people think this has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, we are normally bombarded by advertisements. Most of the companies use break time during

sports

events to advertise their products. While some people argue that it’s common to promote their products through various sporting events, some people feel that it will lead to the de-emphasis of the

sports

itself. The number of people watching

sports

is increasing over recent years. Mostly,

sports

televised

games

are free cost for viewers.

This

is only possible when the large corporations buy the break period for advertisement so organizers of the events can run the shows without any obstacles. Funds accumulated not only support the broadcast to be free but

also

enable the owner’s place to maintain and improve their facilities.

For example

, basically, football

games

in Thailand are free entry but its riches with advertisements. For these reasons, advertising in

sports

games

is a primary catalyst for improving the quality of

sports

games

.

On the other hand

, others argue that the effect aggregate is that audiences feel

games

are only the platform for adverts and individual players and organizers become a millionaire from those revenues.

For example

, there are many athletes who turn out to be rich because they are the man of the community and are favoured by citizens. Large corporations prefer to invest their advertisement expense on TV programs where those popular players participated with. In my opinion, there are

also

negatives in advertising on

sports

shows. To conclude, we cannot deny the adverts because we live in an economic society which is driven by advertising. Advertising is significant but the feeling of audiences through

games

is more important. There should have

sports

shows that

also

consider the viewers’ feelings.