Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion

A lot of people are talking about the climate right now. To be more specific, they talk about environmental

problems

and how to solve them. Within

this

issue, there is a disagreement between a group of people who wants the

problems

solved on a global

scale

and a group of people who wants them solved nationally.

Firstly

, I think that both groups are right in

this

discussion. Some situations had to be handled on another

scale

than others.

For example

, Greenhouse gasses can not be reduced within a country, but

problems

regarding their culture, like the consumption of meat,

Furthermore

, every activity we execute to reduce the impact on the environment is still something. So if there is a group that tries to solve them on a domestic

scale

, nobody will prevent them from taking any action.

Nevertheless

, I think that we have to deal with the biggest

problems

internationally. For these

problems

Add a comma

,problems

show examples

we need the consensus of all the big nations in the world like Russia, China and the USA. If one of those countries continues to pollute the environment, the others are just working for nothing.

However

, it is very hard to make sure that all the noses are pointed in the same direction. To ensure the support of all the nations in the world, we need the UN to draw up an agreement.

Subsequently

, if every country has signed

this

contract

then

we can put some pressure on a specific country if it lacks in its motivation to reduce the impact. In conclusion, I think environmental

problems

can be reduced both globally and nationally, but it all depends on the

scale

of the problem. Despite

this

, from my point of

view

Add a comma

,view

show examples

it will be better to deal with it on a global

scale

.

This

is because of the difference in impact.