Some people claim that too much focus and resources have been spent to protect wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With the increasing number of preservation for wildlife, especially those for

animals

and birds, some

people

claim that the emphasis and spent are too much.

However

, others, including me, believe that these expenditures are necessary and inevitable. On the one hand, some

people

may argue that

animals

do not need any extra protection. while it is considered that the extinction of

animals

as part of the natural cycles, many different species have disappeared, and new stains have emerged naturally.

Therefore

, concentrating on

this

matter should be restricted. Apart from that, these resources can spend on other vital sections

such

as the economy and health.

For example

, governments in developing countries where

people

do not have access to good hygiene, water, and food, should not focus mainly on preserving

animals

.

Nonetheless

, saving

animals

has its importance, and it should prioritize.

On the other hand

, many

people

might see the preservation of

animals

as a necessity. Today, humans intervene and manipulate nature exceedingly more than ever. Many

animals

are vanished or lost their habitats.

As a result

, it becomes a responsibility to save all kinds of

animals

.

Moreover

, all breeds play their role in nature, and any extinction will bring environmental changes that may lead to an irreversible catastrophe.

For instance

, squirrels play an important part in breeding trees by hiding the seeds underground. So personally, I think the amount of focus and resources is not too much, and indeed, it should be done perfectly. In conclusion,

although

it appears that massive resources and time are spent saving

animals

and birds, these approaches are crucial and needed to protect the environment.