Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give you own opinion.

With the advent of technology globally,

information

has been readily accessible. Some individuals believe that a great deal of advice should be shared in research, commerce and the academic world. Whereas, others argue that invaluable data should be restricted. In my opinion,

knowledge

should be restricted

instead

of been shared freely. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss both views and give reasons for my opinion. On the one hand, having unlimited

access

to data gives room for problem-solving in different areas. Through exposure to

information

on medical practices, the quality of care has been improved.

For instance

, having unrestricted

access

to practical and theoretical

knowledge

on emergency responses

such

as Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation and Basic life Support has helped to reduce mortality rates.

Although

, it is of great importance that

information

is circulated in different societal aspects but not applicable in all cases.

On the other hand

, some

information

should be considered invaluable to be shared with the public.

Firstly

, the government has secured

information

as it can be detrimental to society.

For instance

, some terrorist groups have garnered

knowledge

of making explosives from free

information

made available on the internet and

this

has caused mayhem in different countries around the globe.

Secondly

, some companies protect their databases because they have invested in resources to maintain their standard and avoid plagiarism. In

this

case, it is evident that not all

information

should be accessible to everyone. In conclusion, it is indeed beneficial to have

access

to unlimited

knowledge

but it is more detrimental to have

access

to unrestricted data.