Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.

Both lecture and the reading are discussing communal online
encyclopedias
. The former is of the opinion that communal online
encyclopedias
' theories are not logical. While the latter provides three points to support her belief about communal online
encyclopedias
.
To begin
with, the
first
issue we encounter is associated with a lack of academic credentials. The speaker highlights that
this
theory is not convincing due to the fact that there are a lot of errors and it is hard to see on the PDF online.
Moreover
, she demonstrates her point by saying that if someone wants the PDF without any mistakes, it cannot find it.
Furthermore
, she says that these printings are still remaining decades.
On the other hand
, the text posits that traditional
encyclopedias
are produced by trained professional writers to have standards of academic rigour that normal people cannot achieve.
Moreover
, another topic of the debate revolves around corrupt information. Once again, the professor points out that it is easy to recognize the article.
Besides
, she illustrates
this
point by mentioning that putting the crucial fact in the article that nobody reads the format.
Additionally
, she provides that making sure the strategies are reliable.
However
, the article confirms that vandals or hackers have the opportunity to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information in the encyclopedia To wrap things up, the final point in the discussion is connected to limited space. The instructor suggests that it decides which one is important and which one is not. What's more, she explains that spaces are not an issue for online academics.
Nevertheless
, the passage states that the communal
encyclopedias
focus too frequently, and in too great a depth.
Submitted by mafrey_playgirl on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: