Countries should produce the food that their population eats, and import as little as possible. To what extent do agree and disagree? Give reasons, examples to you answer.

In many countries, foods are reproduced as many as possible, but there are places, where their outcomes are more imported. Economics emphasizes that the government should provide the public with enough foods than importing. Currently, tons of the population are suffering from a lack of food. Because of that, people are contrary to selling the
products
for another republic. If we check the details and databases, per year, half-billion of the population are dying because of the commodity deficit. I suppose the administration should manufacture adequate production, and no one is able to save the populace except for the nation. Two years ago, I wrote an article about the shortage of output, and I suggested assembling taxes from the primary layer of society. The
next
suggestion is recreated
products
or 3D
products
. Israeli scientists invented to fabricate artificial meat through 3d printers and it is the best way to fulfil the demand for cheap meats.To some extent, I agree that ascendancy should ensure the state with food in a logical principle.
However
, the fact that countries have to make money for upgrading and developing land. So they import the commodities for that reason. According to the fact, most countries are reaching the financial peak through importing and debts are funded by marketing
products
Thus
, we can not reject
this
process, because you have a chance to earn money with importing. The population should be funded by importing profits. they are funding by marketing
products
this
week and not reject
this
process because you have a chance to earn money with importing. In conclusion, I totally agree with importing outcomes.
This
procedure is proven by theoreticians and politics. Starvation will not stop if we abolish importing.
Submitted by khushnudrustamovich on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • self-sufficiency
  • trade dependency
  • food security
  • sustainable agriculture
  • local economies
  • carbon footprint
  • supply chain
  • food miles
  • agricultural sector
  • domestic production
  • import substitution
  • food sovereignty
  • global supply chains
  • trade imbalances
  • food standards
  • economic resilience
  • biodiversity
  • cultural heritage
What to do next:
Look at other essays: