Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do. To what extent do you agree or not?

There is a controversial perspective heating up a debate over the function of the norm which is enacted by the government. While

this

statement is valid to some extent, I consider myself an advocate of

this

notion that it is not effective if

people

do not obey. Without a shadow of a doubt,

rules

and

laws

are indispensable things in society. It contributes to making a standard community with a high appreciation for all aspects.

For example

, Viet Nam is a country that enacts a wide range of

rules

and

laws

for

people

to abide by and they have to have a responsibility to suffer the penalty if they do not adhere.

Therefore

, the prescript will be an important part to make society be better. While the significant role of the norm is widely acknowledged, its counterpart still lingers. The

rules

that a nation makes published are counterproductive if the residents still persist to do everything that they like because it is easy to make the society’s vices.

For instance

, American dwellers have a pressing problem, which is racial discrimination. In fact, the American government does not have any law that

people

have to behave equally with all the ethnicities in the world so there is a great many battles between white and black

people

.

Hence

, the

laws

will be ineffective if

people

do not obey and always do everything that they like. In conclusion, high appreciated society is attributed to the

laws

and

rules

and of course, it will be counterpart if

people

do not comply.