In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's world?

It would be argued by some that middle schools objective is providing a few
subjects
which are necessary for students job in the prospective. In my opinion,
however
, a widespread education with a lot of
subjects
need to be offered by intermediate schools. On the one hand, there are several reasons why people believe that children should focus on a narrow range of
subjects
related to a specific career.
Firstly
,
this
helps facilitate students' future career preparation. Only studying several
subjects
that will be of use in the forthcoming could allow enlistment to nurture in-depth knowledge and skills in the career they hope to pursue after graduation. Take an engineer as an example, to work in that field pupils only need to pay attention to a few
subjects
such
as maths, physics or chemistry, while music or history might be not only redundant but
also
take them lots of time to learn.
Secondly
, these days, many recruiters tend to favour candidates with a good grounding in a single field over those who have general knowledge but has little or no expertise in a particular area.
On the other hand
, I would argue that it is important for that academy to widen young learners' insight. The
first
reason is children might have more opportunities to gain an overview of a wide range of
subjects
and understand different aspects of life.
This
is because they are able to explore all kinds of fields with support from institutions. These things help them develop comprehensive thinking and become a more well-rounded person. Another logic is the majority of children from 10 to 15 years old are not mature enough to decide which subject they are genuinely passionate about. If teachers ask them to determine which job they will work in the subsequent or which subject they think is advisable, It would be an extremely difficult decision for them. For that reason, they should be given the chance to get exposed to as many
subjects
as possible to identify their subject of interest. In conclusion,
although
others think that it is necessary for students to be concerned about
subjects
which are important to their job, I personally believe that it will bring a lot of benefits for them when secondary schools build a general learning programme.
Submitted by htkd3295 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: