Some people think that government should invest in saving local languages while others think its a waste of money. Discuss both views and your opinion.
In
this
day and age, a minor language is disappeard
once in Correct your spelling
disappeared
fortnight
. It is generally acknowledged by certain individuals that local Add an article
a fortnight
languages
should be protected by the investment of governments
. However
, others believe that it is a waste of money. Regarding this
, I strongly believe that govenments
should allocate state funds to keeping local Correct your spelling
governments
languages
as well as other public services
.
One
the one hand, some people argue that Correct your spelling
On
governments
should spend money providing better public services
and urgent issues rather than saving a local language. While inhabitants can use other strong languages
such
as English for a living, they cannot be survived without proper public services
. In other words
, education, healthcare services
, and transportation are a
key Correct article usage
apply
factor
in Fix the agreement mistake
factors
a
living. Correct article usage
apply
For example
, according to the theory of the hierarchy of needs by Maslow, before people achieve basic needs such
as accommodations, food, and garments, they cannot feel safe and love which are important to lead to self actualization
. As the example clearly illustrates, Add a hyphen
self-actualization
governments
should use money
on public Add an article
the money
services
instead
of keeping local languages
.
On the other hand
, by saving local languages
in monor
countries, people can keep national Correct your spelling
donor
honour
identities
. As languages
are the most important part of cultures, once they lose thier
own culture, national Correct your spelling
their
identities
will be disappeared. For instance
, when Japan conqured
Korea almost 100 years ago, Correct your spelling
conquered
Japanese
banned Koreans Correct article usage
the Japanese
using
Korean Change preposition
from using
first
since they believed that losing languages
means losing cultures, thereby leading to losing national identities
. Therefore
, government
should allocate funds to maintain local Add an article
the government
languages
in order to keep national identities
.
In conclusion, while I accept that public services
are essential for a living, there is no doubt to point out that saving local languages
is not less important than them. Therefore
, governments
should balance between providing fine public services
and keeping local languages
.Submitted by hiasince38 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.