Nowadays more and more people choose living separately from their families. What are its causes and consequences

Smoking is apparently harmful to people’s health despite its legitimation, thereby is it suitable to prohibit all smoking behaviour in public areas? From my point of view, I do not approve of it to a large extent. Admittedly, smoking may have a negative effect on individuals’ lungs, which might cause a series of diseases

such

as lung cancer if being addicted to it for a long time. In light of

this

fact, it seems to be reasonable for the government to ban smoking in all public places so as to make

smokers

healthier by law. Simultaneously, since smoking can

also

affect the people staying around

smokers

, prohibiting smoking in public places could protect those “innocent” people from the harm of

cigarette

Fix the agreement mistake

cigarettes

show examples

.

Hence

, in terms of the interests of both

smokers

and non-

smokers

,

this

method seems to be plausible.

Nevertheless

,

Add an article

a cigarette

the cigarette

show examples

cigarette

Fix the agreement mistake

cigarettes

show examples

would be addictive, which means the public who keep smoking for a long time may be uncomfortable if they cannot smoke for several hours. In terms of

this

, it might be not feasible to ban smoking in all public areas since it would affect some people’s normal lives and freedoms.

Furthermore

, if the law is announced,

smokers

may tend to stay at home to study or work. If

this

happens, not only can some citizens’ health be influenced due to the lack of walking outside, but the national economy might

also

be affected adversely. To sum up,

although

this

plan seems to be beneficial to people’s health, it may be unfeasible if the feeling of

smokers

and other potential consequences are considered. From my perspective, if the government can use some softer ways to guide people not to smoke,

this

plan might be plausible in the future.