It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important ? Do you agree or disagree

Many people believe that the government should finance the welfare of other public

services

,

instead

of spending its budget on protecting wildlife.

Although

I agree that the state's investment in public

services

is very important, I think that proper funding for wildlife is

also

crucial for society. Let us delve deeper into

this

issue in the upcoming paragraphs. On the one hand, The government should definitely allocate a large part of its budget to public

services

.

This

economic sector determines the overall quality of life, ensuring that some basic

services

such

as schools, hospitals and roads are available to all citizens irrespective of their income or social status. Public

services

satisfy the primary needs of society and

thus

need proper funding.

For example

,

absence

Correct article usage

the absence

show examples

of medicines in any country will create significant problems. That's why the local authorities should adequately finance public

services

in the

first

place.

Conversely

, Spending money for the protection of the flora and fauna is not a waste of money, since they are an integral part of people's existence. The wildlife manages the ecosystem and most scientists agree that these habitats are

also

crucial for survival. If we let them die out,

then

the cost to the survival of humans is unbearable.

For instance

, rainforest produces oxygen and absorbs carbon dioxide, so without

them

Add a comma

,them

show examples

it would be very costly to make artificial oxygen for all human beings.

Therefore

, by protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on earth. In conclusion, I agree that the government should allocate a large part of its budget to

such

urgent needs of the nation

like

Change preposition

as

show examples

public

services

. I think that the state should not neglect and finance the protection of local flora and fauna.