Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too significant or too valuable to share freely. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sharing most

data

in diverse fields

such

as science, technology, and the economy is a great idea.

However

, the issue is not entirely straightforward, and arguments can

also

be made against the idea.

This

essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view. The supporters of the idea of sharing

information

freely claim that it would be beneficial to share as much

data

as possible;

thus

, everyone will be able to expand their knowledge in various areas, including novel scientific, academic, or financial findings. They believe that everyone should have

access

to the latest sources, even if they cannot afford to pay for learning.

Moreover

,

this

group oath that accessing some

information

would be an emergency, and it might be impossible to pay before getting

access

to

data

.

For instance

, many women surf the net during pregnancy to realize if something is dangerous to eat or do; in these cases, they need quick

access

to articles.

On the other hand

, the opponents of giving

data

and

information

freely cite that most researches require a great budget, and collecting

data

would be a demanding task. Take experimental researches, which requires facilitated laboratories or professional devices, as an instance. These types of equipment cost a fortune;

consequently

, some researchers might have to pay from their budget, making releasing

information

for free unfair.

Furthermore

, people usually do not put enough effort into free stuff, and they might nobble these

data

and employ them for illegal goals

instead

of discoveries. As a consequence,

this

valuable

information

could lead to awful hazards. To conclude, it might be impossible for a group of people to

access

monetary

data

according to their situation. in my viewpoint, it is more logical that researchers get paid not only for sharing

information

but

also

for the blood, tears, and sweat they spend.