More and more people in developing countries are purchasing cars for the first time. What problems does this cause?

Nowadays, it is often argued that the relationship of adolescents with streets, and in certain regions of the US a

curfew

is implemented which means that

teenagers

cannot go out of home without an adult. From my point of view, the decision has negative,

such

as neglecting freedom, and positive, like safety and to prevent of potential risks, outcomes. Even if

this

restrictive decision has some advantages, disadvantages have more valid causes. On the one hand, the

curfew

concept is one of the enemies of liberty and independence of the young.

First

of all, they are at enough age to make their own choices, what it should be. For

this

reason,

curfew

and the thought that

teenagers

must not leave their homes without accompanying an adult could create an unsocial generation due to not knowing how to decide on behalf of

teenagers

.

Furthermore

, as they are isolated from social life, they would not find a chance to face the reality of life,

in other words

, street hardships.

On the other hand

, the

curfew

conducting currently may be a requirement in terms of safety.

For instance

, outside the home could include detrimental impacts on them

such

as getting harmful habits like drug and alcohol use.

Additionally

, the friends met on the streets might affect badly to their behaviours.

This

issue may impact their education life as well. By and large, the curfews and procedures as to going out are incorrect in respect of the adolescents' freedom and being isolated, despite some positive sides which can be ignored.

Teenagers

are mature enough to take their decisions and it should continue without any prohibition.