Being good at math depends more on natural ability than on the quality of teaching they receive. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

In
this
globalized aeon, without any ,qualms it is accepted that being good at maths is a natural
ability
and teaching is less important. Some people coincide that being good at
math
is genetic. Howbeit, I debunk them and proffer that learning is important for
math
and it is not dependent on natural
ability
. Compelling evidence are obtainable to demonstrate the notion of learning
ability
is important in natural science. The paramount concrete reason is practice, namely, if people make more practice, they will obtain success at
math
. To go hand in hand, the supernal rationale drags me to persist in a good school. The hindmost feature which is inextricable to be accounted for is a worthwhile teacher. To uphold my article of faith, I would jot down an illustration of obtaining
math
ability
to good teacher because teachers affect children's intelligence. What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others, so the public across the board discriminates that
math
information depends on natural
ability
which has myriad reasons. To commence with, some people reckon that if a child's parent's occupation is teacher, scientist and engineer, the child learns
math
easily. Withal
also
justify that analytical
ability
is passed to children by parents. To synopsize,
i
Change the capitalization
I
show examples
pen down saying that there are innumerable robust factors underpinning the fact that children's development in
math
depends on the school environment, academic staff and parents' responsibility. Ergo, its contrary can be overlooked or curbed.
Consequently
, I firmly disagree with the given statement and opinion.
Submitted by hesenovhemid121 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: