You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. You should write at least 250 words.

Children
's
vaccination
against common illnesses has been a never-ending debate. Some individuals opine that
children
should not be vaccinated
against
Change preposition
for
show examples
the well of their
parents
, whereas others think that governments should impose
vaccination
on
children
.
Although
some might disagree with the
second
view, I completely agree with it.
This
is due to the fact that most
parents
do not have enough medical knowledge and governments should be responsible for
children
's
health
.
To begin
with, most
parents
do not have the required medical knowledge to decide the best for their offspring. Owing to the fact that most of them surf the internet net to seek an answer to their
children
's medical issues.
For instance
, an article that has been published recently
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
showed that 90% of
parents
tend to rely on the internet to find
a
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
medical
explanations
Correct the article-noun agreement
explanation
show examples
for their
children
's difficulties rather than visiting doctors.
Thus
, their medical opinion should not be trusted.
Consequently
, they should not make any medical decision that could lead to irreparable consequences in the future including immunising their
children
. Because
children
's
health
is part
from
Change preposition
of
show examples
public
health
, governments should be responsible for it. In light of fact that it is essential to
national
Add an article
the national
show examples
interest.
For example
, hospitals do not have to treat as many
children
with life-threatening conditions.
In addition
, the more vaccinated
children
, the more likely to gain
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
herd immunity.
Furthermore
, authorities have more resources to devote to
children
than
parents
.
For example
, they can provide access to many
health
care institutions. In
this
regard, a healthy generation would be expected to support the nation's economy
that
Correct pronoun usage
which
show examples
could increase the standard of living for many. In conclusion, the controversial topic
concerning
Change preposition
of
show examples
making
vaccination
mandatory for
children
never fails to attract public attention. I completely support the idea of imposing a mandatory
vaccination
on them as most of the
parents
do not have solid medical understanding and authorities should be responsible for
children
's
health
as a part of their public
health
responsibilities.
Submitted by aymanshabakaa on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Herd immunity
  • Ethical responsibility
  • Public health
  • Preventable diseases
  • Misinformation
  • Community welfare
  • Individual freedom
  • Economic impact
  • Outbreak
  • Healthcare system
  • Vaccination laws
  • Immunization
  • Communicable diseases
  • Vaccine-preventable diseases
  • Public health policy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: