Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds. All levels of education, from primary school to tertiary education should be free. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
It is commonplace to see governments around the world spending billions of dollars on
education
. Whereas some people argue that everyone should have access to all levels education
, I argue that it is counter-productive and jeopardise the development of other Change preposition
of education
sectors
.
To begin
with, free education
cultivates a variety of talents to address the needs of the
Correct article usage
apply
society
. This
is because everyone, regardless of their financial ability, will gain an opportunity to hone their skills and become a useful member
of Fix the agreement mistake
members
the
Correct article usage
apply
society
. For example
, there will be more skillful
doctors to carry out surgeries and lawyers to fight against injustice. Change the spelling
skilful
This
will ultimately benefit the
Correct article usage
apply
society
as a whole. Furthermore
, the country will become more competitive on the world stage. Since there is a larger pool of talents, it is be
much easier to achieve breakthroughs in various Change the verb form
is
sectors
like science, medical and military, and become leaders in these fields.
However
, I believe that many students will feel less motivated to study. As compared to paying their school fees directly where individuals understand that the education
they receive does not come easy, students may not aware that the free education
system is ultimately funded through a complicated tax system, and they end up taking the valuable education
opportunity for granted. On top of that, free Replace the word
educational
education
could be a success at the expense of other sectors
’ development. Considering that the cost of providing free education
for all is an astronomical figure, governments will have to limit the expenditure on other sectors
to support the free education
system. In other words
, equally important sectors
like transport and housing will be sacrificed.
In conclusion, although
free education
makes the country more competitive and equips the society
with experts to accommodate the needs of the public, it is an unwise approach because it thrives at the expense of other important sectors
and students may become less motivated to work hard.Submitted by youhua94 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.