Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds. All levels of education, from primary school to tertiary education should be free. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?

It is commonplace to see governments around the world spending billions of dollars on
education
. Whereas some people argue that everyone should have access to all levels
education
Change preposition
of education
show examples
, I argue that it is counter-productive and jeopardise the development of other
sectors
.
To begin
with, free
education
cultivates a variety of talents to address the needs of
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
society
.
This
is because everyone, regardless of their financial ability, will gain an opportunity to hone their skills and become a useful
member
Fix the agreement mistake
members
show examples
of
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
society
.
For example
, there will be more
skillful
Change the spelling
skilful
show examples
doctors to carry out surgeries and lawyers to fight against injustice.
This
will ultimately benefit
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
society
as a whole.
Furthermore
, the country will become more competitive on the world stage. Since there is a larger pool of talents, it
is be
Change the verb form
is
show examples
much easier to achieve breakthroughs in various
sectors
like science, medical and military, and become leaders in these fields.
However
, I believe that many students will feel less motivated to study. As compared to paying their school fees directly where individuals understand that the
education
they receive does not come easy, students may not aware that the free
education
system is ultimately funded through a complicated tax system, and they end up taking the valuable
education
Replace the word
educational
show examples
opportunity for granted. On top of that, free
education
could be a success at the expense of other
sectors
’ development. Considering that the cost of providing free
education
for all is an astronomical figure, governments will have to limit the expenditure on other
sectors
to support the free
education
system.
In other words
, equally important
sectors
like transport and housing will be sacrificed. In conclusion,
although
free
education
makes the country more competitive and equips the
society
with experts to accommodate the needs of the public, it is an unwise approach because it thrives at the expense of other important
sectors
and students may become less motivated to work hard.
Submitted by youhua94 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • accessible
  • economic backgrounds
  • primary school
  • tertiary education
  • free education
  • fundamental right
  • social mobility
  • economic mobility
  • reduce inequality
  • financial barriers
  • educational opportunities
  • government funding
What to do next:
Look at other essays: