government investment in public transport and reductions in public transport prices will greatly help the figh against transport pollution Do you agree or disagree ?

Many people believe that the lower public

transport

cost owing to state investment will deteriorate the amount of

transport

pollution.

Nevertheless

, I strongly disagree that cheaper public

transportation

tariffs due to state investment will significantly propel the abatement of

transportation

pollution.

First

, the abatement of

transportation

pollution should be more focused on the research and development of renewable resources to be vastly utilised in public

transport

rather than investing to reduce the

transportation

cost. Deploying the use of renewable energy will generate energy efficiency and minimise the propensity of any polluted emission to harm the air.

For example

, green resources used in public

transport

in developed countries,

such

as Germany, have succeeded to abate the emissions significantly.

Thus

, investing in public

transport

to cut the

transportation

prices has no evidence to reduce the number of

transport

emissions.

Second

, the lower the public

transport

fee the more people will be attracted to use public

transport

in their daily mobility.

For instance

, when the authority cuts the public bus prices, there will be a spillover effect on the surge of passengers due to the lower-priced tickets.

Instead

of reducing the operational time schedule of public buses, the price discount will gather more people to buy the tickets, affecting more buses operating and more gas discharged to pollute the air. In conclusion, the lower public

transport

prices due to government investment will spawn more emissions into the air. In suggestion, it is evident that the government should consider investing in renewable efficiency to be vastly deployed in mass

transportation

rather than focusing on cutting the public

transport

bill.