Housing shortage in big cities can cause several social consequences some people think only government problems can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Big cities have their own advantages;

therefore

, it is more arduous for the population to have their own house in that areas as there is a housing shortage some people opine that only

authorities

should respond to overcome

this

problem. I completely disagree with

this

notion. I believe that joint efforts of

government

and private construction firms should be the responsibility. My inclination is justified

further

with reasons and examples. The foremost argument to prove my point is the role of

government

in the housing issues is significant. It is true that

authorities

should provide the housing schemes to the citizens; combine with the other aspects of issues : poverty and unemployment. They need to allocate the homes along with the employment. For an instance, the Indian

government

provided apartments for those who worked along with central

authorities

and construction projects.

However

, only governing bodies are not responsible for mitigating the housing issues. The real estate companies should

also

be involved in the process.

This

means industries should give an affordable budget to the central

authorities

for the construction of more houses.

As a result

, more numbers of folks can purchase apartments.

For example

, according to the news report, in the Assam, the private Dilip buildcon company provided a cheaper housing budget for national

government

projects which solved housing problems. In conclusion, it is irrefutable that parliament has a major role in order to provide low-cost buildings notwithstanding the real estate company's need to contribute in order to ameliorate the situation.

Hence

, it would be wrong to say that only

authorities

should take the onus to solve it .