Computers have become so advanced and interactive that students in the future will have no need for a human educator in the classroom. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.

Nowadays,

computers

play a significant role in educating enlistment

such

that one is permitted to nurse the thought that over time and with advancement in computer technology, the need for human educators will be negligible or non-existent. I,

however

, disagree with

this

assumption. The reasons behind my thinking will be explained in the essay below. The importance of

computers

in modern-day learning for

students

, and even going forward, cannot be over-emphasized, as it has made learning very flexible.

For example

, learning with

computers

can be done even outside the classrooms, at home etc. ,

however

, it will be preposterous to think that without

humans

, the advantage seen with computer learning will be possible.

Humans

, being the creator of

computers

are already equipped with the knowledge of its operability

such

that it can be put to full use to ensure that it becomes advantageous in enhancing or easing the acquisition of knowledge for

students

.

For instance

, it takes a human to know that the computer can be used for distance learning,

thus

, creating the set-up to ensure

this

. Again, the maintenance or upgrading of

computers

to improve their suitability for learning can only be achieved with

humans

.

For example

, the improvement and flexibility we see with

computers

nowadays with respect to their proficiency as a learning tool for

students

were only made possible by

humans

.

This

, in itself, has made

computers

to be seen as generally useful in training

students

. In conclusion, even though

computers

will continue to be useful in the learning process for

students

, they will never replace the role of

humans

in teaching

students

.

This

has been discussed in the essay above.