Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agreee or disagree with this statement.

For decades, people use trains and harbours for transportation. With the improvement of the world and ,technology countries should decide to fund lines rather than roads. With

this

in mind,

this

essay will explore to what extent I agree with

this

argument. The

first

argument connects with the investment in line relates to reducing air pollution. As you may notice the more people use the rail lines the more autos are gone on the harbour. And for that, the amount of burning fossil fuels lessens and releasing into the atmosphere of these fuels decreases. The other point that needs to be mentioned relates to the usage of electricity by trains on track. If citizens live in cities use tracks more ,and they don't need auto anymore by

this

usage of electricity decrease the releasing of fossil fuel gases into the atmosphere. A

second

but equally important point highlights that with the increase of railways, existing traffic can be reduced by society. If fewer citizens drive their own cars, the number of cars on the roads decline. At

this

point, there will become less traffic. Another mark shows that if the investment in railways rises society can reach wherever they want to go easily.

Therefore

, the living population prefer using

this

transportation method when they go out and try to reach anywhere they need to go. As a

consequent

Replace the word

consequence

show examples

governments must invest in railways more than roads. Reducing polluted air and crowded wharf need to be preserved for the

next

generations.