many people believe that countries should produce food to all people of the country and ipmort as little as can. do you agree or disagree.

At present,

food

is a major concern. It is believed by many people that governments should take steps to produce the

food

crops sufficient enough to feed all the people of their

country

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

so that only the minimum

food

items can be imported from other countries; critics,

however

, criticize

this

idea as

of

Change preposition

apply

show examples

no importance. I personally agree with the former school of thought and in what follows, I will argue my opinion with

example

Correct article usage

an example

show examples

.

Firstly

, one of the main positives of growing enough

food

crops for the population is that the government does not need to buy expensive

food

products from foreign countries.

In addition

to that, they would not have to pay a hefty tax on imported items.

Consequently

, the nation prospers as the economy the

country

would boost.

For instance

, Pakistan produces 180 tons of mangoes each year to feed not only its nation but

also

export it to other countries and

as a result

, there is an incline in the economy of the

country

.

Secondly

, it will improve the climate of that

country

by growing more plants.To be more precise, When more barren and stray lands would be converted into farmlands, It is believed that the amount of carbon could be decreased

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because plants act as carbon-sinkers by absorbing carbon. As high levels of atmospheric carbon are a major reason for global warming,

thus

it is anticipated that global warming can be controlled by

food

-producing plants.

For instance

, Pakistan witnessed a major drop in temperature

last

year because of the 100 billion plant tsunami project.

However

, scientists might argue that

this

idea is not applicable because of the geographical difference and climate across the world. A

country

could not produce all sorts of

food

crops because of differences in weather, availability of water , nature and composition of soil and difference in temperature. To sum up, it is

therefore

agreed that, the state should produce enough

food

to feed its family as it can not only boost the economy but

also

could decrease climate change.