Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people a better education. Do you agree or disagree?

Although

sending someone to prison is the common way to control crime in many countries, enhancing education can be more effective to eliminate the problem from its root. In my opinion, I disagree with

this

statement because it is unreasonable to compare these two methods as each of them addresses the issue in different ways. On the one hand, receiving a sentence plays a vital role in social security.

First

of all, there should be a suitable way to punish communities that commit illegal actions in order to ensure the safety of other citizens. To illustrate

this

, criminals will have more time to reflect on their illegal acts, they may change their awareness to become good citizens.

Moreover

, the government imposes a prison sentence in order to set a good example for the public.

As a result

, more and more people will be afraid to break the law owing to knowing that they will be isolated from society, lose their freedom and have a bad reputation.

On the other hand

, education can be considered a way to eliminate the problem from its root.

This

solution heightens people’s intellect and prevents the public from having heinous actions. If those are well-educated, they earn more knowledge about morality and the consequences of breaking the law.

Consequently

, the number of criminals in society will be hopefully reduced in the future.

Additionally

, in the prison, criminals have a chance to undergo vocational training that helps them earn their living when reintegrating into

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

society. To sum up, I believe that these two methods solve the problem in different ways;

thus

, we cannot make any comparisons between both of them and they should be used simultaneously to tackle the issue of crime.