In recent years, distance learning has become increasingly ubiquitous in schools.
Although
a large number of people reckon that today's system, where students acquire a secondary and tertiary education from teachers in the classroom, will completely cease to exist by 2050, I wholeheartedly argue that Linking Words
this
will persist in the future.
One of the most noticeable reasons is that a handful of subjects are required to take lessons in the class. To give an example, scientific experiments, which cannot be done online, are indispensable to satisfy students' intellectual curiosity and Linking Words
make
them captivated by science. If these lessons were taken online, they would not gain a better understanding of scientific know-how and lose their enthusiasm toward science, which cannot lead to Verb problem
captivate
further
improvement of the economy and international competitiveness in many facets of science in the foreseeable future.
Another reason against Linking Words
this
topic is that face-to-face interaction with educators can ameliorate pupils' interpersonal skills, enabling them to have better career prospects. To illustrate, students can build cordial and committed relationships with their peers until they have severe personality disorders. If they were supposed to get in touch with only online services, they would not have good people skills. Linking Words
Therefore
, it is classroom sessions that can Linking Words
make
pupils polish up these techniques.
Verb problem
help
To conclude
, Linking Words
due to
the difficulty of teaching a few subjects and the scarcity of in-person communication, I strongly argue that school lessons should be abolished under no circumstances in three decades, which means that people have access to direct lectures from tutors.Linking Words