some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time spent on laerning facts and not enugh on learning practical skills. do you agree or disagree?

nowadays, the educational curriculum relies on theories rather than practical skills because teaching them needs more equipment and leads to more expenses. unfortunately, I completely agree with

this

statement and I believe schools and universities should change the ways of teaching. some people believe that children and adolescents only learn various written facts and the educational system pays less attention to doing experiments

although

the teaching theories

is

Correct subject-verb agreement

are

show examples

vital for enlistment to make the basis of knowledge in their minds.

for example

, when I was a student we had only 2 hours a week for the science laboratory course which if I had been the manager of the educational ministry I would have increased the hours of it since doing an experiment for especially university students is fully beneficial and

also

help them to memorize materials better in their minds. Other people claim that not only practical subjects are not essential for all majors but

also

students can learn them by being apprenticeship in various working environments.

However

,

this

idea means learning facts are necessary and we cannot skip

this

stage of learning. In my experience, some core subjects

such

as maths and politics are just theoretical

as a result

these ways of teaching depend on the kind of courses. In conclusion,as the practical skills are really important the educational plan needs some amendments to improve.

by

Change preposition

apply

show examples

increasing hours of teaching in laboratories and even different ,industries can be reached.I think

this

reform would be useful for all stages of learning and teaching and

therefore

can make more interest in admission.