Some people believe that nuclear weapon is the solution to world peace. Others, however, think that they only cause conflicts. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

While it is widely claimed that nuclear

weapons

could create peace in the world, some argue that

it

Correct pronoun usage

they

show examples

can result in relations crises. Both points of view and the reason why I believe that

this

artillery

not be used as a diplomacy instrument to maintain global peace will be elaborated

on

Change preposition

in

show examples

this

Change preposition

in this

show examples

essay.

To begin

with, it might seem sensible for some to believe that nuclear

weapons

represent the peacebuilding strategy among the global community, seeing that these

weapons

play an essential role in international diplomacy in order to prevent largescale conflicts that can bring to contribute war. North Korea,

for example

, has demonstrated a surprising military ability to defend itself against powerful nations,

such

as the United State and Japan, by conducting nuclear test sites. From

this

perspective, it is understandable why some would prefer the deployment of nuclear arms.

On the other hand

, opponents of

this

idea might propose that nuclear

artillery

can solely contribute to conflicts. To put

in

Correct pronoun usage

it in

show examples

other words, nuclear superpowers can deploy the existence of a military nuclear program to threaten their neighbours. Russia as one of the world’s nuclear power countries,

for instance

, has escalated its conflict crisis with Ukraine by using tactical nuclear

weapons

. Personally, I would argue in favour of nuclear

artillery

threatening global peace, as these

weapons

can be used in inappropriate actions

such

as military intrusion. To illustrate, most of the powerful states in the past forced smaller nations to their benefit.

Consequently

, assuming that a superpower appears to create the fear that nuclear war could happen at any time, small countries might be lost their policy independence, leading to more harm than many would imagine. In conclusion,

although

it is undeniable that nuclear

artillery

can be used as a powerful diplomatic strategy, I am of the opinion that these

weapons

only cause conflicts in order to contribute to the benefit of their powerful states.