It will be better to have wide use of driverless car for individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

Some

people

consider that community and individuals can be benefited from the widespread application of

driverless

cars

. As far as I am concerned, I agree with

this

viewpoint to a small extent as the drawbacks can overtake the benefits.

To begin

with, having wide use of

driverless

cars

can result in unemployment. As only a little academic qualification is required to become a driver, many

people

live upon

this

occupation.

For example

, some early in Hong Kong support their life by working as a driver.

Therefore

people

will be replaced by robots or machines once the

driverless

car is imported.

As a result

, those with low education will lose jobs and turn to government subsidies in order to finance their daily expenditure.

However

, some

people

argue that using

driverless

cars

can reduce the chance of accidents. As the processes of robots or machines are set by humans, the sensitivity will not change to other factors.

For instance

, machines’ attention will not be affected by chatting. In another word,

driverless

cars

can maintain a high concentration at any time.

Therefore

, a safer reaction can be made by

driverless

cars

in some emergency situations as they can calculate and analyse the data in a shorter time. In conclusion,

although

safer traffic can be provided due to the high-quality reactions made by the

driverless

car, there are actually fewer and fewer road accidents recently.

Therefore

, protecting the job positions is more crucial as it can bring a financial burden to both individuals and society.