It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, our society is faced with the ageing of certain structures which require subsequent investments in the development of myriad establishments.
Nevertheless
, rather than losing time by erecting new lodgings, some might consider promoting renovation
instead
. In my opinion, it is essential to upgrade the aged sites.
Thus
, it begs the question : By which strategy can more positive effects be derived ?
This
essay aims to answer
this
question by supporting the thesis that repairing old premises may have meliorative aspects.
To begin
with, one clear reason to invest in enhancing our current properties is to avoid waste by not only reaping the benefits of former endeavours undertaken but
also
dodging any demolition procedures.
In addition
, these places have historical remembrance which should be preserved.
For instance
, many policies with regards to repairing and renovating old lodgings in France were recently voted for and stipulated that a lot of money will be given to families living in old houses and apartments to perform their ecological transition.
Hence
, there is a serious need to ensure that these premises are protected
Also
,another argument in favour of not getting rid of formerly built housing is about inhibiting the stress humanity puts on natural spaces.
Furthermore
, whereas repairing them only demands undertaking changes on already urbanised lands, destroying blank natural areas becomes mandatory when raising more constructions.
For example
, in Denmark, certain sites are not touched at all but simply upgraded.
Thus
, owing to
this
, even though it could offer modern flats or houses to many families,
this
policy would have disastrous consequences on ecosystems and biodiversity. To conclude, repairing and renovating our available infrastructures seem to be undeniable and better options.What's more, society, in general, will enjoy the value of
such
improvements. If
this
path is followed in the future,
this
policy could drive us away from a plethora of adverse impacts that the environment could undergo.
Submitted by benjamincj on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: